Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Little League politics

If The United States ever becomes a third-rate power, its unprecedented force of entrepeneurs and catalytic dreamers putrified into a melting pot of slothfulness and complacency, the blame may lie squarely in the epidemic of Little League.

Here children are taught that failure is the most they can hope for and that just about anything they do more competent than stepping in front of a car en route to the field, will result in lavish praise.

Little League of course, has its better known aspect, that of parents berating children for slandering their genes by striking out, fighting each other in the stands and abusing the umpire and players on the opposing team. To mitigate that image, sympathy has been planted at the core of the corporation.

In case a child does not feel bad about striking out, parents following the lead of the coaches will now show him that he should, by glorifying his shortcomings.

“Great swings,” a player hears as he returns to the dugout after striking out with no more threat to the ball than an ice cube to the climate of Death Valley. “Good job.” Now he knows he will receive attention and succor for striking out and government aid crawls to the horizon of his consciousness.

Ultimately the child sees that no one expects him to be able to hit the ball or succeed at anything in life and America’s place in the world drops infinitesimally.

I managed to avoid little league until fatherhood. If your kid would like to play some ball, he has to join because they’ve usurped all the ballfields and all the other kids. Gone are the days of the pick-up sand lot game. My eight year old boy, normally one of the better hitters, had strike five on him. Failing to grasp the desperation of my ancestry, I yelled, “You’re supposed to hit the ball.”

It was so politically incorrect and so naturally refreshing to hear a parent give his kid a little ribbing, that an involuntary chuckle burst from the bleachers. After strike six Sam walked back to the dugout trying to suppress a grin that showed he appreciated being the only kid not taken for a fool.

Little League has some stock phrases that you’ll hear more in one game than “uh” in a George W. press conference. “Baseball ready” is the most ironic, used to transfer the players’ gaze from a passing butterfly to events at the plate. The true meaning of course, is recline with beer in hand. My favorite is “Good eye.” This is used to encourage batters not to swing at bad pitches. And passing airplanes. The ball can be so far out of the strike zone that it can’t be seen and if the child refrains from swinging the bat just then, he will hear, without exception, “Good eye.”

Who knows what the tike is thinking when this happens or if he even knows what it’s supposed to convey. He may think the parents and coaches are complimenting themselves with “Good I.”

One coach ever ready to find something nice to say, was faced with the challenge as a seven year old swung and missed at six straight pitches, finally ending his at-bat. “Way to hang,” he came up with, though it sounded to me like he had resorted to rating the boy’s genitals.

The spread of Little League throughout the world is America’s best hope to survive its effects as civilization will climb backwards together with us at the top of the pile, albeit a lower one.

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Surf and camp -- obsolete words by today's standards

In the all-out assault on good words (Bush, of course, being the most conspicuous casualty), surf and camp now have bitten the dust. Surfing, which once depicted riding an ocean wave on a board, now can be accomplished in a tiny cubicle looking at a computer screen, doing any number of other things simultaneously. And camping once had to be done in the woods, or at least outside. Now any tedious lesson imposed in the summer is a camp. There is a video-game creating camp.

Pretty soon nobody will know what anybody is talking about

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Letter to the Editor of the Orlando Sentinel

Dearest editor:

Our country is in the hands of ruthless nincompoops responsible for the ongoing horrors in Iraq, Israelis and Lebanese are killing each other and bombs are going off occasionally in subways. Amidst all this proof that humans, including Americans are, by and large, a horrible species, it is very hard to find kindness. If you do, don't tell the Orlando city council about it, because if it's in their jurisdiction, they'll squash it like an Iraqi bug.

Petty and small-minded has been redefined by our city. While the civilized world is in chaos our local rulers have managed to ferret out our most pressing problem - the program to feed the homeless in Eola Park. By God, let's hear it for the Gothics. They sure dress funny but it appears they have a foundation in what is called decency. Decency is bad for Orlando's image, offends developers, who have only profit in mind, something a city council can better relate to than an empty stomach.

Anyway, really, look at these compassionate ones. If they would wear business clothes or belong to the Jaycees, well, it might not look so bad. But Food not Bombs? Come on. Not only are they against hunger on their doorstep, but war as well. What kind of creeps are these?

If Orlando had no houseless people, they should be imported just so we can sit back and watch these radicals take care of them. Because, especially nowadays, it feels good to see a little organized kindness. And we should be proud to have such people in our midst. But we have a city council that feels inclined to squash them. Our city council would have outlawed the bread lines of the Great Depression.

Forty-five people spoke against the ordinance to ban feeding the homeless within a two mile radius of city hall and four spoke in favor. So, by democracy, it passed. No wonder Iraq is in no hurry for it.

Before it was just a bad joke. Now Orlando's city council is a disgrace.

-- Tom Levine

Monday, July 24, 2006

The Thought Provoking Mudfish

Jack London despised the domestic dog, naturalist Ed Abbey urinated on ant hills and Mark Twain had only poison for the French. These eminent literary outdoorsman scorned three widely diverse creatures innocently born into what they are. For sure they had one sentiment in common though.: a deep and abiding loathing of the bowfin.

Yes, the blameless bowfin, finning gaily here and there, opening his toothy mouth occasionally to briefly thrill an angler thinking he has hooked something else, anything else. The bowfin has been more kinds of fish initially than any other and is never himself until the evidence is undeniable, for no one fishes who is not an optimist.

Its identity is so tenuous in fact, that it is never called by its given name. Bowfin is not spoken - only written. Generally any amount of swearing will locate one. Recently I chanced upon Andy Rooney sitting under a frayed straw hat, cane poling in a roadside ditch. I inquired about the fishing.

“I don’t know why,” he whined, “you can’t just ask me how many mudfish I’ve caught. That’s more to the point, isn’t it?”

“Alright. How many bowfins have you caught?”

“You know, I’ve never cared for the name. It doesn’t tell you what you want to know, does it? Is it half mud and half fish or is it three quarters mud? Some people think they’re completely mud. I like that.”

How the Mudfish might have got its Name

Two old gents were angling down in the old slough. One of them pulled up a bowfin. “Whatchew got there?” said the other.

“I don’t rightly know,” said the first. “I think it’s a fish.”

“No, look to me you jus’ caught a gob o’mud.”

“It’s a fish.”

The other leaned over squinting. After a time he concluded, “Nope. That’s jist the durndest gob o’ mud I ever did see.”

“It’s a fish.”

“Mud.”

“Fish.”

“Mud.”

Then they looked at each other and smiled. “It’s a fishmud, ain’t it?” said the first.

“Durned if it ain’t.”

Does the bowfin deserve all this ill will? The name “mudfish” always seemed unjust. Although they can inhabit muddy water, I have not found one in solid mud, seeing them often in clear, flowing streams. It’s true they do not suit the palate. After throwing them back for years, it occurred to me to be open minded and try one. I can report that the very filleting of a bowfin is disgusting, the flesh slimy and putrid. Not one to be put off by trifles, I sauteed a small piece and upon eating it learned the origin of its name. The rest was offered to the cat who instantly ran away from home, proving that this ancient fish does have a useful application.

In Florida the conversation often reaches another of Mother Nature’s children who obliviously inhabit human thoughts, the manatee. The vast majority of opinions emanate from compassion and appreciation. The rare empty headed view is always the same: “I hate manatees.”

It is hard to imagine anything less hateable than a manatee but here it is again - the general slander of an innocent race. Perhaps these individuals are all eminent literary outdoorsmen. On hearing it the first time, I thought, horrified, “Oh, man. Her family must have been slaughtered by manatees.” Loathe to learn the truth yet spurred by morbid fascination, I asked why.

“They’re so ugly.”

The answers can be classified by gender. Women who hate manatees always give this reason. Based simply on looks, one would expect women to love the manatee, as it gives them all a favorable comparison. But perhaps they can’t stomach someone going around looking like that without doing something about it. The men are likely to hold against them the government regulations instituted for their protection, which sometimes interfere with high speed motorboating.

“Pardon me for being protected,” I heard a manatee mumbubble once in passing.

“Excuse me for being endangered,” another apologized.

Ever the scientist I continue to ask why when I hear it and finally was rewarded with that invaluable aid to research, the anomaly. I swear that the following quote is absolutely true and that it came from the proprietor of an investment firm in New Smyrna Beach. We were in his office and I never will forget it because I wrote it down. I said, “Please can I have a sheet of paper and a pen? I wish to record those words you have said.”

Pleased as punch he handed them over. The following is a word for word transcription. I never would tamper with such a pure example of whatever this is: “Well, you know - all the government red tape and bullshit. Manatees are dinosaurs. If you had elephants walking on I-4, do you think they’d close that? No way.”

After recovering the facility of speech and requesting writing tools, I said, “Thank you very much. Everyone I meet from now on will seem quite sensible because I will compare them to you. Let me further congratulate you, a financial advisor. I have heard many stupid things said about manatees, but yours is the undisputed champion. You are indeed a rare individual to volunteer such damning evidence about yourself. If knuckleheaded remarks about endangered species becomes an Olympic event, and it wouldn’t surprise me, then you, sir, are the horse I will back. For training I will find a spot on the bank of Blue Springs Run where you can sit and constantly be reviled by these monsters and inspired to your greatest elocutionary heights.”

I am not so sure of the accuracy of my comment because I wrote it down much later. However, the spirit is intact.

While the bowfin is despised universally by fishermen only, the manatee is despised only by knuckleheads. If there is some kind of a connection here, it escapes me. I chanced to spy Mr. Rooney again, on a bank of the St. John’s River and asked if he had spotted any manatees. He turned to look at me, then his shoulders slumped as he sighed in apparent exasperation.

“Why does everybody have to call them “manatees”? Sea cow was good enough when we used to grill them. Everybody knew what you were talking about and it’s certainly a more picturesque name. Maybe I’ll just go to the movies and see a matinee. I think I like that.”

We all have our little prejudices. Mr. London and the manatee haters occupy small, bitter minorities. We are left to wonder if he hated manatees also, because they have the quizzical, friendly look of the domestic dog. And the manatee is the rare wild animal that will seek us out and accept food and a scratch on the belly, the very behavior he seemed to detest so in the dog. Mr. Abbey persecuted the pismire for its neurosis and Mr. Clemens loathed the French for their cruelty. If there is a common thread among the ant, the Frenchman and the bowfin, it is too fine for me to see. Perhaps there is a little mudfish in everybody.

The life of a man can be ruined by the eating of a single aunt

In the beginnin’...

In one corner of a long ago whitewashed room is a small table with a banana on it. Both banana and table are underneath a fly. The fly knows shape - nothing else. He thinks he’s sitting on a turd. The fly is not wrong because he has recently crapped on the banana.

A gunshot is heard and the dead fly tumbles to the table top. His shit remains on the yellow fruit, a monument to where he had been. A demure curly headed little girl sidles into the corner and without noticing the monument, lifts the banana from the table and shoves it up her ass.

These proceedings have been totally witnessed by God Almighty who puts it all down to Genesis and the governor of Mississippi Frogfart Pondodor who says, “What fly? I don’t see no fly.” Probably Governor Pondodor shot the fly.

Governor Pondodor and God Almighty are heard breaking into a chorus of “I shot the sheriff but I did not shoot him in the fly.”

The fly fails to see the humor in any of this because he is dead. But he is not dead because he had no sense of humor. He is dead because an assassin failed to see the human in a fly sitting on a banana.

Flies make people look like shit. They have many ways of doing this, the most common of course being hypnosis. They congregate in the morning and hypnotize each other toward this end. It’s a sort of fly humor. When you walk amidst flies feeling very godlike, swatting them as you go, have you never wondered why they keep trying to land on you?

In the days of Abraham Lincoln people knew how to leave pins sticking out of their butts.

Miss America or leave it. There was a time when people knew better than to leave pins sticking out of their butts. There was a time when spaceships ruled the toilets and submarines the sky. But no more. “The sky is underwater!” cried the fly. “How do I swim and keep me dry?”

Thursday, July 20, 2006

And yet another from Arnie

Bush vetoed Stem Cell Research
Because...........he can't spell it.
WAR..............that he can spell

Friday, July 14, 2006

Yet another from Arnie

Shiite Happens! W
Thanks to you!

3" x 6" Color: White on Black with Red W
Vinyl $ 1.75 each. Quantity 50+ $1.25 100+ $1.00
Bush lovers won't love this one.Too bad!
It looks wonderful on my car.
For more ordering information E-mail Alevine99@aol.com

Another submission from my brother Arnie

To Be A Bleeding Heart
You Gotta Have One!

Buckwheat is better than Alfalfa at sports

Once again science has discovered what everyone already knew, and acknowledged that Buckwheat is better than Alfalfa at sports. This establishes the wisdom behind the historic exclusion of Negroes from Major League Baseball and many colleges and universities (so the white boys'll get to play). Now that it's official, it's time to do something about it.

With the physiological superiority of the Negro documented, there is no reason why athletes of other races need to continue competing with them. It is time to reestablish the Negro leagues. The existence of gender separation in sports sets the precedent. The frustration of female athletes having to compete with men is identical to that of white men against black. These days young white men no longer dream of a career in sports. It is simply too unlikely with their standard issue. Instead they must turn to sedentary goals. It is the optimistic white boy indeed, who works toward an Olympic gold medal. He has little chance.

We must read the graffiti on the wall. Basketball, football and now baseball are becoming "colored only". Hispanics are today's white baseball players. Let's change the national poem to "Ramos at the Bat". With the New Colored Leagues, we can once again look down a baseball roster and read names we can pronounce.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

To all my conservative friends and family

Something my brother, Arnie Levine, sent me:

To All my Conservative friends and family:

I received this letter which was included in a fund raising package and was asked to forward it to all the loyal Republicans I know.

I had no more money to send, but I am honoring their request.

Here's the letter:

6/6/06

Dear Fellow Conservative
,

In order to ease the suffering in your knees from all the genuflecting you do in front of your autographed picture of our beloved George
W. Bush, we have formed a charitable organization to provide some much needed financial assistance in the form of FREE Kneepads (fur-lined), of course.

I urge you to register at
www.Kneepads.com You will be contacted to arrange for your Free pair of kneepads.

We know you are in pain but with our 32% Approval Rating many, many other loyal Republicans are suffering as you are. In 2 years the pain will go away, hopefully. Our health system won't help
you and those godless Democrats that don't genuflect won't help you either.

Please Register ASAP before we are out of kneepads. For more information visit our website:

Thank you.

Tom Delay
Chairman
RNC

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Available on my site as a bumper sticker or decal.

If you like Sean Hannity
You've Lost Your Sannity

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Bush Ain’t Funny

Laurel and Hardy, like heads of state, could battle with no risk to their health. In a tiff they would set about smashing each others’ things, each politely allowing the other to finish before retaliating. Their behavior illuminates the essence of war, the dispensable property, of course, being people. The affronted parties fling out their lower class taxpayers to kill or be killed, then step back out of harm’s way to portray sorrow over the carnage. Unlike Laurel and Hardy, the humor is very dark.

Before the United States attacked the Taliban, their leader made a truly statesmanlike offer: To meet George Bush on the field of battle like men and spare the non-stakeholders. It seemed outlandish but only in the context of our chicken-shit society. The challenge got little play in the media and Bush ignoring it got no play at all. He preferred to sacrifice the lives of brave soldiers and innocent bystanders to free Afghani women from their burkhas, which, according to recent reports, have been exchanged for pedophilia and venereal disease in the ensuing chaos. Al Kaida, whoever he is, exited stage right.

Iraq is boxed in by the No-fly zone and powerful countries at its borders leaving its only claim to glory these days, recognition by the United States as a worthy foe. Interesting that killing heads of state like Saddam Hussein, the advertised focus of the latest crusade, is against the law, but killing the victims of his oppression and American soldiers is perfectly legal.

Sad as it seems, George Bush must be a reflection of what the American character has become, because Americans are prepared to let war proceed against a faraway country that has never so much as farted our way. We are separated from Iraq by the Atlantic Ocean yet European nations must be persuaded of the danger Sadam Hussein presents. And it doesn’t collectively appall us that pursuit of this war will result in everyday families being blown to smithereens as we coldly lay them in the coffin of “collateral damage”; this to save our unworthy asses from the trumped up possibility that Iraq might someday give us an owie. It is not only inhumane but cowardly and violates every moral code Americans take pride in embracing. Putting such a premium on our own lives in fact devalues them. It makes us not worth saving. We must bear constantly in mind that politicians live not at the apex but near the bottom of the human heap and from there they wield their power. The masses must guide these moral cripples to an acceptable path, not adopt their corrupt standards as our own.

War with Iraq clearly was part of the Bush agenda, 911 the excuse, however illogical. It was a deception of despotic proportions to keep this platform plank invisible during the election, to omit the campaign cry, “A vote for B ush is a vote for war!” Then the people could have spoken from their hearts. Terrorists may have hijacked Islam, but oil barons have hijacked the United States. If Americans allow their country to be led into war by this scourge of ruthless nincompoops, retribution will be visited upon us and, as always, not upon the perpetrators. In the world view, we’ll deserve it.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Losing limbs in Iraq -- at our President's request

The United States of America has required tens of thousands of Iraqi men, women and children, to lose a limb or two, be otherwise horribly disfigured, or die, so that we can pursue our agenda, whatever it is. George Bush never asked them what they thought about this sacrifice. He just imposed it upon them.

This same should be required of every American who supports or supported the so-called war. Nothing could be more fair. How many hawks would have remained hawks if this suffering had been guaranteed for them? If the question had been put to them, "Would you support attacking Iraq if it means many Iraqi children will be killed and maimed? " Clearly the answer was a resounding "yes", because everyone knew this would happen.

"Would you support the attack if it means you must be maimed or die?" Of course we know the answer in their hearts would be "no." Suddenly many mitigating circumstances would cloud the path to war and it would be abandoned. Interesting difference, that.

Dick Cheney said the day he shot his bird-shooting buddy in the face was the worst day of his life. One has to wonder what it was that bothered him so. Certainly not the carnage, as every day people are blown apart and shot to pieces with his blessing. More likely it was the bad press he got, or the bird he missed on the other side of his friend's head. It's the little things, really, that we find annoying.

Death tally show whom America has really attacked

America attacked not Saddam Hussein, not repression and certainly not Osama bin Laden. Those three are alive and well. But, according to independent tallies, somewhere between thirty and one hundred thousand people have died from the American invasion of Iraq. Clearly that is who the mighty America attacked, because that is who is dead. The United States has achieved at least ten times the toll from the Twin Towers, and in the wrong country.

When all other justifications failed, our country offered, with one-hand democracy, a gift the Iraqi people never solicited. With the other hand our country delivered chaos, misery and death. Why Iraqis don't revel in these boons and thank us, Allah only knows. Still the United States hunts down and kills those Iraqis with the courage and fortitude to resist our generosity.

But hey - that's the government for you. Dadgum, dadgum gov'mint. Governments are by nature oppresive. Whadda you gonna do?

The American public is the part that gets me. The so-called "pro-lifers" who decry abortion in America have approved with their silence the American rescue of thousands of Iraqi women, children and pregnant women from the travails and joys of life. Of course another huge number of people have been relieved of some of their limbs, a clear rescue from the joys of life but a multiplication of the travails. Politicians never mention the dead and maimed Iraqis, and politicians are our best barometer of public interest; so I have to believe they are a non-issue in our largely Christian society. We Americans have selective courage. We are afraid of being blown up, yet we are unafraid to inflict explosion on others.

We have a president who is publicly repulsed by the sacrilege of using stem cells from a dead fetus, yet he initiated this Iraqi massacre with no good reason, and there is no outrage, no overwhelming rejection of him. Isn't murder a violation of the Ten Commandments? Doesn't God reserve the right of retribution? Aren't we cowardly to allow helpless, inoffensive people to pay the price for our security?

The Attorney General excuses the administration's wire-tap program as worth it, if by chance one important phone call is intercepted. This pathetic mindset projects that anything is alright as long as there is an infinitesimal chance that it will save our sorry butts. I submit that placing such a high value on our sorry butts renders them not worth saving. We no longer breathe the rarefied air of a society striving toward the ideal.

Since we are not a nation of unkind people, as revealed in times of domestic duress, I can see only one explanation: except that we bleed, cry and die in the same way, Iraqis are not like us. We never could terrorize a Christian country of European looking people in this way, because we could relate to them as humans. That would be unconscionable.

Dolphins are sentient

Here's a letter to the editor I wanted to share:

Maybe the general public doesn't grasp the idea that orcas and dolphins are sentient, conscious beings, probably more "intelligent" than we techno-chimps. And maybe most people didn't know that "Shamu" (and trust me, that's not his real name) and the rest of them have families and lives in the sea that they'd like to get on with. And probably most of us don't realize that after their life sentence in an aquarium, kidnapped from their families, these mammals die a premature, unimaginably lonely death.

But when Sea World presents a radio ad depicting these captives as being excited about their new show and all the video screens they have to entertain the tourists with, because, really, they're just so jazzed about their job; well, let's hope their marketing department has severely overestimated the gullibility of today's children.